Changing the filebrowser from a "file carussel" to a "file page" was a big step forward in useability.
But this filebrowser still has potential of improvement:
* it cannot handle directories -- only the contents of a single, job bound directory
* it cannot handle more than one screen full of files -- and not everyone uses a 16:9/ 24" widescreen monitor
* it shows icons, which costs a lot of screen space and does not provide more than the difference between
man and woman as information about the files contents.
* If one creates "too much" versions of a model, s/he has to move older files into an subdirectory, which in
turn cannot be seen or visited with the filebrowser.
Or in other words: _You have to move files out of the way of the filebrowser to keep it useable_ .
My suggestion would be: Why to invent the wheel a 12th time?
Just implement (or even use a ready-to-use example or library) old fashioned fileselector box for that job?
And as long as one either has to use a low resolution screeen to recognize the barely visible differences in
the icons of the models and only be able to handle a handful of files OR to use a high resolution screen,
which offers more space for the files of the "filebrowser page" but renders the icons beyond any visible
difference more subtle as the difference between the genders I would think of stop using icons at all.
Nameing the files with speaking name is up to the user than.
Only my two cent....your filebrowser may vary...

Best regards,
mcc