Aranuvir wrote:That's one of the backgrounds of the survey. Currently it looks like it is very hard to almost impossible to support MakeHuman on macOs furthermore. And we would like to know how many users will be affected then.
In 2006 I bought my first iMAC. Before I worked with SuSE Linux. This iMAC had an Intel processor, a lot of tools out of the box, but also an X11 adaptation and everything works. I used the best from both worlds.
In 2012 I bought a MAC Mini, I didn't want to go back to Linux, but I wasn't sure so I bought a monitor which fits to a normal PC also. The tools weren't much better, and I had to switch off a lot of processes so that the system didn't stall on an external Harddisk, it did not communicate with Apple every second and didn't scan a photo collection for faces etc. Furthermore I had to registrate to use a system I had bought with my real name.
Blender worked and for MakeHuman I found a way to get the newest version work. It looks that Apple tries to do it the way they are doing before the Intel iMAC. Funny enough they started to do the same crap like windows has done, hiding file extensions ... the effects we see, when Apple User without knowledge that MacOS is unixlike ask questions in this forum.
Try to find these characters {, [, ], } on a German Apple keyboard, Apple doesn't like programmers. They like users paying for programs. Next thing, I guess, would be smart phone buttons on the screen ... windows tried that already ... we know about the success.
So, this year I returned to Linux. There are some bugs also and it was not simple but I did not regret it. In the company I work for, Apple was an alternative for Linux as well. This has changed now. So we have Windows for Office and Linux for all operative systems again.
My small Apple is doing "slave jobs" now.